Funny. There are a number of fans and voters concerned about a number of mid-tier Heisman candidates. Colt Brennan fans are upset (and perhaps rightfully so) that the mid-major player is not receiving a fair shake, and Glenn Dorsey fans are irked by the idea that a lineman cannot win the award over a skill position player.
Perhaps the biggest tragedy amidst all of this is the fact that so few have come to the defense of UCF running back Kevin Smith.
As readers of this column are well aware, I try to tell it how it is -- not always how I see things, but how a majority of Heisman voters likely see things. Smith is guilty of the same crime that Brennan is (poor conference thus weak schedule). His name is not nearly as recognizable as Brennan's -- more on par with Tulane's Matt Forte. And yet Smith's numbers are more impressive than anyone else in America -- at any position, offense or defense.
A college running back with 2,400 yards is comparable to a 2,000-yard wide receiver or a 5,500-yard quarterback. Yet Smith is as anonymous as the college he plays for. Consider the following: he's carried 415 times to showcase his durability; he has scored 22 times to show his nose for the end zone; and he gained 173 total yards of offense against Texas to show he can hang with the big boys.
Still upset about how YOUR candidate is being unfairly evaluated by Heisman voters?